Today, the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal handed down a decision in the scope of proceedings against TÜV Rheinland initiated by plaintiffs who claim to have received PIP silicone gel breast implants.

The Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal has been referred with this matter by the appeal lodged by the notified body TÜV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH (“TRLP”) and TÜV Rheinland France SAS (“TRF”) against two judgments of the Toulon Commercial Court dated January 20; 2017, which found TRLP and TRF liable in the PIP case.

The Court of Appeal found TÜV Rheinland liable in these proceedings. The Court did not order any additional damages.

However, the Court of Appeal dismissed the claims brought by more than 6,000 persons who do not prove that they wear or have worn the type of PIP silicone gel breast implants concerned by the fraud and covered by the certificates issued by TRLP.

“TÜV Rheinland challenges the position from the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal which goes against a long series of positions taken in its favor by many courts and authorities that have examined the merits of the PIP case so far, including the Court of Justice of the European Union in February 2017 and the Versailles Court of Appeal in January 2021”, said Maître Christelle Coslin, lawyer of TRLP and TRF in these proceedings. “The evidence in this case clearly shows that TÜV Rheinland acted diligently, in compliance with applicable regulations, and it was not its role to track down the fraud pursuant to regulation. In addition, at no time in the scope of its mission, the notified body has been aware of elements suggesting that breast implants manufactured by PIP were not compliant. TÜV Rheinland is analyzing this decision with a view to referring the matter to the French Supreme Court”.

TÜV Rheinland would like to emphasize that, on January 14, 2021, the Versailles Court of Appeal ruled that TRLP had not “breached its obligation of care and control in the performance of its certification mission carried out”. It considered that the notified body TRLP has not been aware of any element relating to non-compliance of PIP implants and that “TRLP appropriately reacted to the information it received”. The Versailles Court of Appeal added that “TRLP cannot be blamed for not implementing additional measures”, such as unannounced visits.

The notified body TRLP and TRF have submitted a solid and comprehensive file regarding the PIP case. This file demonstrates that TRLP performed its mission as a notified body diligently and in total compliance with applicable regulations and that TRF committed no fault, as the Versailles Court of Appeal ruled a few weeks ago.

At European level, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in February 2017 that notified bodies, such as TRLP, are under no general obligation to pay unannounced visits, to examine products or to examine the manufacturer’s business records. In the scope of criminal proceedings, TRLP was found to be a victim of the fraud committed by PIP and its managers by the Marseilles Criminal Court in 2013, the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal in 2016 and then the French Supreme Court in 2018, which made this decision final.

Background: PIP deliberately manufactured silicone gel breast implants using – at least temporarily – a non-declared silicone filler gel.

By way of a large-scale and particularly sophisticated fraud, PIP deceived all the parties involved: first and foremost women with PIP implants, but also health authorities and the notified body TRLP. PIP always declared that it only used the silicone gel that it declared to TRLP as raw material. PIP provided TRLP auditors with extensive documentation (design dossier, manufacturing records, manufacturing instructions) regarding the alleged use of the declared silicone gel. Any evidence or element concerning the use of different raw materials was systematically concealed by PIP.

As soon as PIP’s fraud was discovered in late March 2010, TRLP suspended the certificates it had granted to PIP.

TRLP is very mindful of the concerns of women with PIP implants and shares their interest in PIP’s criminal actions being cleared up. This is the reason why TRLP filed at the beginning of the case a criminal complaint against PIP and its managers. This has led to PIP and its managers being convicted in a final ruling as guilty of fraud against TRLP.

Downloads

PDF

Press release as PDF
Download
Photo
Photo as JPG
Download

Your contact for editorial inquiries:

Joerg Meyer zu Altenschildesche

Press officer

Joerg Meyer zu Altenschildesche 

Do you have any questions on this topic or need further information? Please do not hesitate to contact us: